Similar to porn logic in which a character in hentai will say or do something unrealistic that would not happen in real life.
Person a:"Dude, he just stuck his 15 inch cock into her urethra! That would kill her!"
Person b: "That's hentai logic for you man"
Person b: "That's hentai logic for you man"
by kimberkat March 21, 2024
Get the hentai logic mug.Typical racist: Oh, that boy wasn’t molested by his female teacher, it’s “lucky boy” behavior.
Common-sense person: he was molested, and your excusing it? 2035 logic.
Common-sense person: he was molested, and your excusing it? 2035 logic.
by YungstarProd March 22, 2024
Get the 2035 logic mug.by Sir Henry Doyle June 22, 2021
Get the Kentucky Logic mug.Digital Audio Workstation made previously by Emagic (now by Apple).
If you're want to dive deeper into the music industry, you MUST use this software as the only tool for recording, mixing, and mastering, combine that with top-notch analogue gear and Grammy awards will come to you.
If you're want to dive deeper into the music industry, you MUST use this software as the only tool for recording, mixing, and mastering, combine that with top-notch analogue gear and Grammy awards will come to you.
Even though Logic does not outperform Ableton Live in terms of popularity, look, so much Grammy winning artists and sound engineers using Logic for their music production
Write the better song, record, mix, and master it on Logic (and use flagship analogue gear during mixing and mastering), distribute it everywhere, and pray for you holding the Grammies
Write the better song, record, mix, and master it on Logic (and use flagship analogue gear during mixing and mastering), distribute it everywhere, and pray for you holding the Grammies
by Sir. B June 27, 2021
Get the Logic mug.Liverpool FC have the best world class players in the premiership. Sure pal…. That GH Logic at full stream again.
by ForestPhill January 12, 2026
Get the GH Logic mug.The problem of self-application: Can the rules of logic be used to justify logic itself without circularity? Logic is the assumed foundation for all rational discourse and proof. But any attempt to prove that logic is valid (e.g., that the Law of Non-Contradiction holds) must use logical inference, thereby assuming what it sets out to prove. This leaves logic resting on an article of faith—that our cognitive machinery for reasoning is reliable. Furthermore, formal logical systems (like arithmetic) are inherently incomplete (Gödel), meaning there are true statements they cannot prove. The ultimate tool for certainty contains unavoidable uncertainties.
*Example: You say, "Logic is valid because it's self-evident." I ask, "Is that statement logically derived?" If yes, it's circular. If no, then you've used something other than logic (intuition) to justify logic, undermining its foundational status. The hard problem: We are trapped in a system of thought we cannot step outside of to validate. It's like trying to use a ruler to check if the ruler itself is 12 inches long. You have to assume the ruler is accurate to begin with. Logic is the ruler we use to measure all truth, but we can never truly calibrate it.* Hard Problem of Logic.
by Enkigal January 24, 2026
Get the Hard Problem of Logic mug.The frustrating reality that identifying a logical fallacy in someone's argument does not automatically prove their conclusion wrong, nor does it validate your own. Fallacies are flaws in reasoning, not truth detectors. The "hard problem" is the temptation to use fallacy labels (e.g., "that's just an ad hominem!") as a rhetorical knockout punch, ending the discussion while providing zero substantive counter-argument. This reduces critical thinking to a game of fallacy bingo, where the goal is to spot errors rather than collaboratively pursue truth. A conclusion reached via fallacious reasoning can still be accidentally true, and a logically pristine argument can lead to a false conclusion if its premises are wrong.
Example: Person A: "We should fix the bridge. The engineer who designed it is a known liar!" Person B: "Ad hominem fallacy! Invalid argument, the bridge is fine." B has correctly spotted a fallacy (attacking the person, not the bridge's condition), but has done nothing to assess the actual safety of the bridge. The hard problem: Winning the logical battle doesn't win the factual war. The bridge might still be crumbling, but the conversation is now dead, replaced by a smug scorecard of who used logic correctly. Hard Problem of Logical Fallacies.
by Dumuabzu January 25, 2026
Get the Hard Problem of Logical Fallacies mug.