by eeeeees bitch March 17, 2024
Get the Toe Jam Paste mug."Babe, do you mind putting on a condom?"
"Not at all! I don't want to get any of my parasite paste into you!"
"Not at all! I don't want to get any of my parasite paste into you!"
by MikeAD March 23, 2024
Get the Parasite Paste mug.a bad teammates in a video game who spends in time in game in bumfuck Ethiopia with his cock in hand licking windows and eating paste and wondering why they are losing
by exxtuhcee June 26, 2021
Get the window licking paste eater mug.The unsolvable chain of evidence. For a past life memory to be verified, you'd need a documented fact from a deceased person's life that the current person could not possibly know through normal means, and you'd have to rule out fraud, cryptomnesia (hidden memory), and genetic or collective unconscious transmission. For the afterlife, you'd need a verifiable, two-way communication with a specific, identifiable deceased consciousness. The hard problem is that any piece of evidence (e.g., a child knowing a dead person's secret) can be explained by lesser hypotheses (telepathy between living minds, chance, subconscious inference). The signal can never be isolated from the noise of unknown psychic phenomena or pure coincidence.
*Example: A child recalls being a pilot named James who died in a WWII crash, giving specific coordinates. Investigators find wreckage there of a plane piloted by a James. The hard problem: This is astonishing, but is it proof of reincarnation? Alternative explanations include: 1) The child psychically tapped into the collective memory/historical record of the event (clairvoyance, not past life). 2) Extreme coincidence plus confabulation. To prove a past life, you must first disprove all forms of present-life psychic ability, which is itself unproven. The conclusion is always one unproven assumption stacked on another.* Hard Problem of Past Lives & Afterlife.
by Nammugal January 24, 2026
Get the Hard Problem of Past Lives & Afterlife mug.The specific difficulty of verifying "memories" or regressions of past lives. Even when details are shockingly accurate (like a child naming a forgotten historical figure), alternative explanations (cryptomnesia—subconsciously remembered information, genetic memory, or sheer coincidence) are often more parsimonious than accepting discarnate consciousness. The evidence sits in a maddening gray zone: too precise to easily dismiss, but never quite airtight enough to force a paradigm shift.
*Example: "During hypnosis, she described a 19th-century farmhouse in perfect detail, down to the willow tree that was cut down in 1887. The hard problem of past lives? We found the records; the farm existed. But we also found a popular painting of that exact farm from 1905 in a book she'd definitely seen as a child. Was it a memory, or a memory of a memory?"*
by AbzuInExile January 31, 2026
Get the Hard Problem of Past Lives mug.Zooming in further: if these are genuine memories, where and in what form were they stored between biological deaths? What is the medium of this storage? If consciousness is a product of the brain, it dies with it. If it's non-local, how does it interface with a new, distinct brain to produce specific, sensorimotor recollections? The problem isn't just proving they exist, but explaining the how in a way that doesn't break known neuroscience.
Example: "The boy's vivid 'memory' of dying as a pilot involved the specific smell of burning engine oil. The hard problem of past life memories: even if we accept a soul, how does a non-physical entity 'remember' a purely physical sensation like smell, and then encode that memory into the new, different neural architecture of a toddler's brain?"
by AbzuInExile January 31, 2026
Get the Hard Problem of Past Life Memories mug.