by sincitywasntmadeforme March 3, 2024
Get the go play ping pong with your ding dong mug.The art form of flicking a man's right or left testicle in such a way that it collides with the other/opposite testicle.
by ass_dermatologist June 26, 2021
Get the Pong mug.The act of accusing someone of turning a debate into a pointless back-and-forth ("ping-pong") by merely responding to their points, thereby framing any defense or counter-argument as proof of their own unproductivity. It’s a meta-critique that tries to invalidate engagement itself, suggesting that by playing the game (using the "paddle"), you are automatically proving the opponent's point that the discussion is futile or cyclical. This fallacy seeks a cheap win by declaring the act of arguing to be the losing move.
Example: In a debate about movie preferences, Person A says, "Modern CGI is soulless." Person B offers counter-examples of expressive CGI. Person A retorts, "Stop swinging the ping-pong paddle fallacy—you're just proving my point that fanboys will defend anything by arguing endlessly." Here, the very act of offering a rebuttal is twisted into evidence of blind fandom, shutting down the exchange.
by Dumuabzu February 3, 2026
Get the Ping-pong Paddle Fallacy mug.The accusation that an entire discussion has degenerated into a repetitive, unresolvable rally of objections and counter-objections with no progress, and that continuing to participate is inherently irrational. The person deploying this fallacy appoints themselves the referee who declares the "game" pointless, often to mask their inability to land a substantive point or to escape a losing position. It invalidates the process of dialectic by dismissing it as childish play.
Example: Two philosophers are deeply engaged in a nuanced email thread exploring a contradiction. A third person interjects: "You two are stuck in a ping-pong game fallacy. This is just intellectual circle-jerking that goes nowhere." This unfairly reduces a complex, evolving dialogue to a mere game, aiming to discredit the entire endeavor rather than engage with its content.
by Dumuabzu February 3, 2026
Get the Ping-pong Game Fallacy mug.A specific variant that casts the argument itself as the mindless, bouncing object being hit back and forth without agency or resolution. It portrays the points being made as inherently empty or trivial—just a "ball" in a silly game. This dehumanizes the debaters and trivializes their stakes, suggesting the topic is frivolous and the participants are just keeping it alive for sport.
Example: During a serious policy debate on healthcare, one side presents a cost analysis. The opponent replies, "We're not doing this. I'm not your ping-pong ball fallacy. I won't keep bouncing this same tired argument back and forth so you can feel like you're playing a game." This reframes a substantive exchange as a trivial volley, attempting to unilaterally declare the topic beneath consideration.
by Dumuabzu February 3, 2026
Get the Ping-pong Ball Fallacy mug.An ad hominem version that attacks the debater personally, labeling them as someone who only argues for the sake of conflict or "playing the game." It pathologizes the act of disagreement, painting the person as a compulsive "player" addicted to rhetorical combat rather than truth-seeking. This fallacy dismisses all their points by attacking their purported motivation for engaging at all.
Example: "Don't bother with him, he's not actually interested in solutions. He's a classic ping-pong player fallacy—he just likes the sound of his own voice and watching people react. Any reply you give is just another serve for him." This disqualifies the person from being heard by assigning them a malicious, sport-like intent.
by Dumuabzu February 3, 2026
Get the Ping-pong Player Fallacy mug.