Scientific Spiritualicide, also Scientistic Spiritualicide, is a form of spiritualice where it consists on the use of science, scientism, positivism and naturalism to show spiritual claims are "pseudoscientific", disprove spiritual things and then finally considers the whole spirituality, esoterics and anything related to them as "pseudoscientific" and start marginalizing spiritual and esoteric communites or make them give up their spirituality and esoterics and become scientific and atheist. Scientific spiritualicide is commonly used to refer to the idea that science is killing religion, spirituality, esoterics and occultism and it has been really accelerated since 2000's and 2010's.
"The scientific spiritualicide is happening and what we see is spiritual and esoteric people supporting it and do not allowing people discuss or talk about this... We are going to have really dark times because of this until spirituality is completely disproved and proved as being "pseudoscientific" and spiritual people will have no other option except become atheist or be sent to psychiatric hospitals to be treated for being religious, spiritual, esoteric or occultist."
by Full Monteirism April 27, 2021
Get the Scientific Spiritualicide mug.Living by applying the scientific method to make the most important decisions, all along doing all one can to never make a decision based solely on an emotion.
Individuals who live scientifically make the most important decisions only after taking the scientific method's six steps: 1) asking a question, 2) doing background research, 3) constructing a hypothesis, 4) testing the hypothesis by doing an experiment, 5) analyzing the data and drawing a conclusion, and 6) writing down the results.
Scientific living also entails doing a great deal of observation, writing down as much as possible what one perceives, along with prioritizing, planning, and calculating likely outcomes.
The opposite of scientific living is living 'spur of the moment.'
Scientific living also entails doing a great deal of observation, writing down as much as possible what one perceives, along with prioritizing, planning, and calculating likely outcomes.
The opposite of scientific living is living 'spur of the moment.'
by but for January 8, 2018
Get the scientific living mug.Alcoholic beverage that humanities graduates consume while criticizing scientists, engineers and doctors.
India's rocket scientists pray at a Hindu temple before launching a mission to the moon.
Communists (mostly humanities graduates): We are ashamed with these rocket scientists' lack of scientific spirit.
Communists (mostly humanities graduates): We are ashamed with these rocket scientists' lack of scientific spirit.
by Bengal Hippo July 15, 2023
Get the Scientific spirit mug.One who engages in scientific gasblowing, or offering unscientific opinions based upon poor understanding of the subject material, insufficient data, poor logic or reasoning.
That scientific pundit on the news didn't know what he was talking about when he gave that monologue about super-string theory, he was just reading the teleprompter. He's such a scientific gasblower...
by Michael Gmirkin June 13, 2008
Get the scientific gasblower mug.Scientific fanaticism is a term used to refer to a form of fanaticism that takes science (scientism) into zealot levels, seeking to use all possible arguments and tactics to defend scientism and put natural sciences as an absolute truth. Scientific fanaticism is also very common among several scientific dissiminators on Internet and it is considered as an advanced form of scientism.
"Scientific fanaticism is no better than religious fanaticism, take natural sciences as an absolute truth is literally like take a religious belief as an absolute truth. Scientific fanaticism and scientism are bad such as religious fanaticism and atheist fanaticism actually are, even that scientific fanaticism is just scientism being taken to the extreme."
"It's ok to be a fan of science such as be religious, spiritual, deist, agnostic or atheist. But one must avoid becoming fanatical for any of those, there's a big difference between being enlightened and being a fanatical, one can be enlightened for any of those such as one can be fanatical for any of those."
"It's ok to be a fan of science such as be religious, spiritual, deist, agnostic or atheist. But one must avoid becoming fanatical for any of those, there's a big difference between being enlightened and being a fanatical, one can be enlightened for any of those such as one can be fanatical for any of those."
by Full Monteirism March 16, 2021
Get the Scientific Fanaticism mug.by BedHeadFred777 October 22, 2011
Get the Scientific Shit mug.by t-dubya April 25, 2006
Get the scientific theory mug.