Terroring

The act of dissing, verbally, physically annoying or checking someone and doing it well. If you're terroring someone, that person has been terrored.

If Sadie would of done that to me I would ended up terroring her.

by Tdispike March 17, 2024

...ø·ø ̈ùšù„ø© ... ø£øoù†ùšø© ù„ù„ø£ø·ù ø§ù„ ... ù„ùšø ̈ùšø§ Terror

A search term on YouTube. This shows up, often when you type this letter: Ø. Videos titled like this are very strange and inappropriate and often contain gore, porn or are disturbing. The reason these exist is to post inappropriate content to YouTube because the YouTube moderation bots are not able to properly scan titles like this due to the lack of letters.

TRUE STORY (somewhat exaggerated)
Me: Hey search “ ...ø·ø ̈ùšù„ø© ... ø£øoù†ùšø© ù„ù„ø£ø·ù ø§ù„ ... ù„ùšø ̈ùšø§ terror”
Friend: OK
Me: What did you find
Friend: SEND ME TO A MENTAL HOSPITAL I AM NOT OK

by 😩 daddy March 17, 2024

... ø·ø ̈ùšù„ø© ... ø£øoù†ùšø© ù„ù„ø£ø·ù ø§ù„ ... ù„ùšø ̈ùšø§ terror

This is a search term on YouTube that would often pop up when you searched a period and still does when searching the Scandinavian letter “Ø”. Videos with this title are often disturbing and have gore and actual violence/murder and sometimes porn. There are many troll videos with this title, however there are also many videos like what I said above. Please don’t search this

Person 1: Hey have you tried searching “ ... ø·ø ̈ùšù„ø© ... ø£øoù†ùšø© ù„ù„ø£ø·ù ø§ù„ ... ù„ùšø ̈ùšø§ terror” into YouTube?
Person 2: No
Person 1: When you get home, search it up
Person 2: OK
Person 2 plays video games
Person 2: I have nothing to do, so I may as well search the thing my friend said to searches ... ø·ø ̈ùšù„ø© ... ø£øoù†ùšø© ù„ù„ø£ø·ù ø§ù„ ... ù„ùšø ̈ùšø§ terror
Person 2: OMG SOMEONE HELP I AM DYING WHAT WAS THAT AAAAAAAAA

by 😩 daddy March 21, 2024

Corporate Civil Terrorism

Corporate Civil Terrorism is a pattern of non-violent, systematic coercion in which an organization weaponizes its civil and administrative authority—discipline, policy enforcement, internal legal positioning, payroll and assignment control, reputational records, and termination power—to compel employee compliance through credible threat of economic and career harm. A pattern where a company uses its own administrative power — HR discipline, PIPs, policy "compliance," termination threats, and internal legal positioning — to intimidate an employee into submission through fear of economic and career destruction, while making every coercive move look like routine management ("it's just policy," "it's just performance").
Distinguished from ordinary bad management by its deniability architecture: each individual action looks defensible on paper, but the aggregate pattern functions as a systematic intimidation regime. The coercion hides in plain sight because it's dressed in process language.
Borrows the intimidation-and-coercion logic from federal terrorism law (18 U.S.C. § 2331) but substitutes economic threats for violence, career destruction for physical danger, and procedural legitimacy for secrecy. The employee isn't afraid of being hurt — they're afraid of being destroyed financially, professionally, and reputationally, and that fear is enough to override any rational attempt at self-advocacy.

"I filed for an ADA accommodation and two weeks later got a PIP I'd never been warned about, then got told if I didn't accept an assignment 90 miles away with no reimbursement guarantee I'd be terminated for 'job abandonment.' Every email from HR sounds perfectly reasonable until you realize the only options they give you are submit or get fired. That's corporate civil terrorism — they don't need to threaten you with anything but paper."

by corporate activist February 26, 2026