Fallacy of Absolute Superiority

The belief that one's position, system, or ideology is simply, absolutely superior—not just better than alternatives, but good in itself, the best possible, beyond meaningful criticism. Absolute superiority is the logic of the true believer, the ideologue, the patriot who can't imagine their country being wrong. It's the fallacy that makes criticism impossible because the thing being criticized is definitionally beyond reproach. Absolute superiority doesn't argue; it declares. It doesn't defend; it asserts. It's the favorite fallacy of those who have identified their cause with truth itself, and therefore cannot hear dissent as anything but error.

Fallacy of Absolute Superiority Example: "He didn't defend capitalism; he declared it absolutely superior. Every criticism was met not with argument but with incredulity: 'How can you question the system that has given us everything?' Absolute Superiority meant there was nothing to discuss—capitalism was beyond criticism by definition. The conversation was over before it started, which was exactly what he wanted."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Fallacy of Exhaustive Conviction

The fallacy of demanding that one's opponent be absolutely, exhaustively convinced before any action can be taken or any conclusion reached. "You're not 100% certain, so you can't act." The fallacy sets an impossible standard—complete conviction, total certainty, no doubt whatsoever—and uses it to block any decision, any action, any conclusion. It's the logic of the certainty trap applied to conviction: since nothing can be known with absolute certainty, nothing can be done. The Fallacy of Exhaustive Conviction is beloved of those who want to maintain the status quo, who can always find a reason to wait, to study further, to demand more certainty.

Fallacy of Exhaustive Conviction Example: "She was 95% sure the policy would help, but he demanded exhaustive conviction: 'You can't be absolutely certain, so we can't act.' The 5% doubt was enough to block the 95% certainty. The Fallacy of Exhaustive Conviction had done its work: making action impossible by demanding impossible certainty."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Fallacy of Impossible Convincing

The fallacy of assuming that it is possible to convince or argue with anyone about anything—including positions so extreme, so absurd, so morally repugnant that they should be beyond the pale of debate. The Fallacy of Impossible Convincing imagines that reason is omnipotent, that every position can be engaged, that no topic is off-limits for discussion. It leads people to "debate" whether slavery should be reinstated, whether genocide has merits, whether racism is defensible—as if these were open questions rather than settled horrors. The fallacy ignores that some positions are not reached through reason and cannot be dislodged by it. Engaging them as if they were reasonable gives them legitimacy they don't deserve.

Example: "He insisted on debating whether racism had any merits—'just to hear all sides.' The Fallacy of Impossible Convincing had convinced him that every position deserved a hearing, that reason could handle anything. But some things aren't positions; they're atrocities. Engaging them as arguments legitimizes what should only be condemned. He wasn't being open-minded; he was being complicit."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026