Reality Bias

The arrogant epistemological stance that one's own perception or model of the world is an unmediated, objective grasp of "reality," and that anyone who disagrees is either stupid, insane, or evil. It denies the interpretive, constructed, and theory-laden nature of all human understanding. In arguments, it manifests as the definitive declaration, "That's just the way it is," shutting down dialogue about differing experiences or interpretations.

Example: A wealthy CEO states, "If you're poor, it's because you didn't work hard. That's reality." This Reality Bias frames a specific, ideologically loaded belief about meritocracy as an incontrovertible law of nature, dismissing systemic barriers, luck, and inequality as irrelevant fantasies.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

NPOV Bias

The specific skew introduced by Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy when applied rigidly or naively. This bias manifests as false balance (giving equal weight to fringe and mainstream views, e.g., climate science vs. denialism), neutering of moral judgment (describing atrocities in the passive voice of "alleged" or "reported" events), and centrism bias (framing the midpoint between two partisan positions as inherently "neutral," even if one position is evidence-based and the other is not). NPOV can become a bias for the bland, the established, and the non-committal.

Example: A Wikipedia article on a tobacco company describes its history of marketing to children as "actions which have been criticized by public health advocates," while also noting the company's "contributions to economic growth." This NPOV Bias uses balanced language to obscure a moral reality, laundering reprehensible acts through the rhetoric of neutrality.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

NPOV Cognitive Bias

The mental error committed by Wikipedia editors who believe that by stripping language of overt emotion and attributing all claims, they have achieved personal objectivity. It is the cognitive bias of believing you have no bias because you are following the NPOV rulebook. This blinds editors to their own ideological assumptions about what constitutes a "reliable source" or a "significant" viewpoint worthy of inclusion.

Example: An editor meticulously ensures every statement about socialism is attributed to a critic or a proponent, believing this makes the article neutral. However, their NPOV Cognitive Bias prevents them from seeing that their selection of which critiques and which defenses to include is itself driven by their own liberal-capitalist worldview, shaping the narrative within a frame they mistake for a blank slate.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026