Legal system determined mental incompetence

Nonono I drew the parallel but that isn't the fundamental claim

Hym "It's that he has a level of Legal system determined mental incompetence that prevents him from truly consent. It's fucking ridiculous."

by Hym Iam April 3, 2024

MAY 12TH NATIONAL FORCEFULLY KIDNAP UR BEST FRIEND LEGALLY

On 12th of may you can forcefully kidnap ur best friend legally and you can use a weapon if they say no. If they call the police all the police would do is help you kidnap that girl.

OMGGG ITS MAY 12TH NATIONAL FORCEFULLY KIDNAP UR BEST FRIEND LEGALLY I BETTER GO KIDNAP MY BEST FRIEND RIGHT AWAY!

by Slaygirlyspopsies May 3, 2024

legalized slavery

Working for a company that pays you near or exactly at minimum wage.

There is too much legalized slavery in this country.

by LouisAWP June 8, 2022

legal frequentism

A theory of emergent rights which states that as human beings; we are all one person in different bodies.

The legal FOUNDATION of postmodernism..

Legal frequentism argues that our bodies--not minds--are responsible for our sundry behaviors. This indicates that we are legally but not morally liable for our actions since we did not choose our individual bodies.

by flightfacilities February 21, 2022

jesus-legal

another way of saying you are 33 years old

It was Dans' birthday yesterday, he is now Jesus-legal

by Entity1002 March 1, 2022

Legal

Adjective, meaning Bunk, ersatz, fraudulent, fake
Devoid of the virtues usually associated with that thing
Stepped-on, devalued, counterfeited, a swindle

I bought an eighth of pot, but it was legal, so ...

by ManIntheHills March 7, 2022

Hard Problem of the Legal System

The problem of self-enforcement: The legal system's authority ultimately rests on the threat of state violence (police, prisons). But what legitimizes that violence? The law itself. This is a circular justification: the law is right because the law says it's right, and it will punish you if you disagree. The hard problem is that the system cannot provide a non-coercive, non-circular foundation for its own power. It assumes its legitimacy, and that assumption is backed by force. Any attempt to question the system's foundations from within is met with procedures defined by the very system being questioned.

Example: You are on trial. You argue the law is unjust. The judge says, "That's not a legal argument." You argue the court has no jurisdiction. The judge cites laws granting jurisdiction. You refuse to recognize the court. You are held in contempt—a charge defined by the court's own rules. The hard problem: The legal system is a closed loop. Its validity is a social agreement reinforced by its own operational success and monopoly on legitimate violence. To stand outside it and demand justification is to invite its force, not its reason. It is the ultimate "because I said so" backed by handcuffs. Hard Problem of the Legal System.

by Enkigal January 24, 2026