N-Dimensional Relativity

Einstein's masterpiece, extended to N dimensions, proposing that space, time, and all additional dimensions are relative to the observer's frame of reference. In N-dimensional relativity, not only does time dilate near massive objects, but the extra dimensions also warp, stretch, and possibly braid together in ways that make your GPS corrections look like simple arithmetic. The theory's field equations are so complex that they cover entire blackboards and require N-dimensional intuition to solve, which no one has. The famous equation E = mc² becomes E = mc² + Σ(dimensions), meaning that your mass-energy equivalent depends on how many dimensions you're currently occupying, which is usually N=4 but occasionally fluctuates, explaining those days when you feel heavier than usual.

*Example: "He applied N-dimensional relativity to his diet, arguing that his weight depended on which dimensions he was occupying. 'In 3D, I'm overweight,' he explained. 'But in 11D, I'm probably a supermodel. It's all relative.' His doctor said that in all dimensions, his cholesterol was still high, and relativity wouldn't help with that."*

by Dumu The Void February 14, 2026

Law of Absolute and Relative Truth

The principle that truth operates in two modes simultaneously: absolute truth (true for everyone, everywhere, always) and relative truth (true within a context, for a particular observer, under specific conditions). The law acknowledges that some truths are universal—2+2=4, water freezes at 0°C at sea level—while others depend on perspective—"this room is cold" is true for some, false for others. Problems arise when people insist that all truth is absolute (denying perspective) or that all truth is relative (denying reality). The law of absolute and relative truth reconciles these positions by recognizing that truth has both dimensions, and wisdom lies in knowing which applies when.

Example: "They argued about whether the movie was good. He insisted it was objectively terrible (absolute truth). She said it was good for her (relative truth). The law of absolute and relative truth said they were both right—absolute truth about the movie's technical merits (which were measurable), relative truth about their enjoyment (which was personal). They agreed to disagree, which is what the law recommends."

by Abzugal February 16, 2026

Law of Absolute and Relative Logical Validity

The principle that logical validity operates in two modes: absolute validity (an argument that is valid in all logical systems, by any reasonable standard) and relative validity (an argument that is valid within a particular logical framework but may not hold in others). The law acknowledges that some arguments are universally valid—if all humans are mortal and Socrates is human, then Socrates is mortal holds in any logic that includes those rules. Other arguments are valid only within specific systems—a proof that works in classical logic may fail in paraconsistent logic. The law of absolute and relative validity reconciles these by recognizing that validity has both universal and context-dependent dimensions.

Law of Absolute and Relative Logical Validity Example: "They debated whether his argument was valid. He insisted it was absolutely valid (true in any logic). She pointed out it relied on the law of excluded middle, which doesn't hold in intuitionistic logic. The law of absolute and relative validity said: valid in classical logic (relative validity), not universally valid (absolute validity failed). Both were right, which is why logic is complicated."

by Abzugal February 16, 2026

Law of Absolute and Relative Logical Fallacies

The principle that fallacies operate in two modes: absolute fallacies (errors that are fallacious in all logical systems, by any reasonable standard) and relative fallacies (errors that are fallacious in some systems but may be acceptable in others). The law acknowledges that some errors are universally wrong—affirming the consequent is a mistake in any logic that cares about validity. Other errors are system-dependent—what counts as a fallacy in formal logic may be perfectly acceptable in rhetorical argument. The law of absolute and relative fallacies reconciles these by recognizing that fallaciousness has both universal and context-dependent dimensions.

Law of Absolute and Relative Logical Fallacies Example: "He accused her of ad hominem, claiming it was an absolute fallacy. She pointed out that in political debate, attacking character is sometimes relevant and not always fallacious. The law of absolute and relative fallacies said: in formal logic, absolutely fallacious; in political rhetoric, context-dependent. Both were right, which is why fallacies are complicated."

by Abzugal February 16, 2026

Law of Absolute and Relative Logical Systems

The principle that logical systems themselves operate in two modes: absolute logic (the hypothetical set of rules that would be valid for all reasoning beings, everywhere, always) and relative logics (the actual systems humans use, which vary across cultures, eras, and purposes). The law acknowledges that there may be universal logical principles—the laws of thought that any rational being must follow—but that our access to them is always mediated through particular systems that are relative to our context. The law of absolute and relative logical systems reconciles the universalist claim that logic is one with the pluralist observation that logics are many.

Law of Absolute and Relative Logical Systems Example: "They debated whether logic was universal or culturally constructed. He argued for absolute logic—one true system for all. She argued for relative logics—different cultures, different rules. The law of absolute and relative logical systems said: there may be absolute logic in theory, but we only ever encounter relative logics in practice. They agreed to keep studying, which is what philosophers do."

by Abzugal February 16, 2026

Law of Absolute and Relative Objectivity

The principle that objectivity operates in two modes: absolute objectivity (a perspective from nowhere, free of all bias and particularity) and relative objectivity (the best approximation of neutrality achievable within a given context). The law acknowledges that pure objectivity may be an ideal we can approach but never reach—like a horizon that recedes as we advance. Relative objectivity is what we actually achieve: perspectives that are as free as possible from obvious bias, while still being situated in a particular time, place, and culture. The law of absolute and relative objectivity reconciles the aspiration to neutrality with the reality of situatedness.

Law of Absolute and Relative Objectivity Example: "He claimed his news source was 'completely objective.' She invoked the law of absolute and relative objectivity: absolute objectivity is impossible (no view from nowhere), but relative objectivity is achievable (minimizing bias, disclosing perspective). His source had relative objectivity at best; his claim to absolute was the problem. He kept watching anyway, which is what people do."

by Abzugal February 16, 2026

Law of Absolute and Relative Factuality

The principle that factuality operates in two modes: absolute facts (statements that are true regardless of perspective, context, or interpretation) and relative facts (statements that are true within a framework but may not hold across frameworks). The law acknowledges that some facts are universal—the Earth orbits the Sun, water is H2O—while others depend on conventions—"this is a meter long" depends on what a meter means. The law of absolute and relative factuality reconciles the reality of objective facts with the observation that many facts are framework-dependent. It's the foundation of scientific realism tempered with sociological awareness.

Law of Absolute and Relative Factuality Example: "They argued about whether the company's success was a fact. Absolute factuality: revenue numbers were real, measurable, undeniable. Relative factuality: whether that counted as 'success' depended on profit margins, market share, and what you valued. The law of absolute and relative factuality said: the numbers were absolute; their interpretation was relative. They stopped arguing about facts and started arguing about values."

by Abzugal February 16, 2026