Theory of the 10 Dimensions of Reality

A slightly less expansive (but still existentially terrifying) model of everything, stopping just short of the ultimate Void. This framework maps reality through ten layers: starting with the three spatial dimensions, adding time as the fourth, and then spiraling through the multiverse. Dimension 5 is the branch of possible yous from a single choice. Dimension 6 contains all timelines from our Big Bang. Dimension 7 holds universes with different physical constants. Dimension 8 is the grand plane containing all these divergent multiverses. Dimension 9 allows for transversal—jumping between any two universes, not just neighboring ones. Dimension 10 is the final container: the set of all possible mathematical and physical structures, the infinite library of every conceivable cosmos. It's everything that could logically exist, but doesn't question what exists beyond possibility itself.

Theory of the 10 Dimensions of Reality "I thought I had seen every possible bad Tinder profile in Dimension 8. Then I accidentally swiped right into Dimension 9 and found a universe where people's bios are just interpretive dance. Dimension 10 assures me that somewhere, a universe exists where this actually works. I'm still waiting."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 22, 2026

Theory of Spaces of Power of Knowledge

A critical framework for understanding that knowledge doesn't float free—it's always situated in physical and social spaces that shape its production, validation, and circulation. This theory asks: Who gets to sit in the rooms where knowledge is made? Whose voices are amplified by the architecture, the technology, the funding streams? What kinds of knowledge are architecturally impossible in these spaces? It reveals that the university seminar room, the corporate think tank, and the community center produce different truths not because they're looking at different realities, but because the spaces themselves are different knowledge-making machines.

Theory of Spaces of Power of Knowledge "Apply the Theory of Spaces of Power of Knowledge to your literature seminar: why are we reading these authors in this room, with this furniture, in this language, at this time of day? Every answer reveals another layer of whose knowledge gets to be here."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 22, 2026

Theory of the Social Power of Knowledge

A systematic account of how knowledge functions as a social resource, distributed unevenly and hoarded strategically. This theory examines how institutions credentialize some knowers and disqualify others, how knowledge communities form and police their boundaries, how epistemic authority translates into material advantage. It reveals that the "marketplace of ideas" is never a level playing field—some ideas arrive with trust funds, others show up in hand-me-downs. Understanding this theory means understanding that every claim to knowledge is also a claim to power.

Theory of the Social Power of Knowledge "The Theory of the Social Power of Knowledge explains why your uncle's YouTube research doesn't carry the same weight as a doctor's opinion, even when they're saying the same thing. It's not about the information—it's about the social position of the informer."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 22, 2026

Theory of Logical Privilege

The critical insight that formal logic itself carries cultural and historical baggage—that what counts as "logical" is shaped by who got to define logic in the first place. Western formal logic, with its excluded middle and its linear deductions, isn't the only possible logic system. Indigenous logics, Eastern logics, feminist logics—these aren't illogical; they're differently logical. The Theory of Logical Privilege argues that elevating one logical system as universal and objective is itself a power move, not a discovery about the nature of thought.

Theory of Logical Privilege "He keeps saying my argument isn't logical because it doesn't follow his syllogisms. But I'm using relational logic, which values context over categories. Your Theory of Logical Privilege is showing—you think your logic is the only logic."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 22, 2026

Theory of Scientific Privilege

The recognition that science, for all its power and validity, occupies a privileged position among ways of knowing that isn't purely meritocratic. Scientific methods produce certain kinds of truth brilliantly, but the privileging of science—the assumption that scientific answers are always the best answers to every question—is a social phenomenon, not a scientific one. This theory examines how scientific privilege shapes policy, marginalizes other knowledge systems, and sometimes overreaches into domains where science has no special authority. It's not anti-science; it's pro-humility.

Theory of Scientific Privilege "Science can tell you the chemistry of this plant, but it can't tell you whether it's sacred. When you act like the chemical answer is the real answer, you're not being scientific—you're exercising Scientific Privilege."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 22, 2026

Theory of Logical Privilege

The critical insight that formal logic itself carries cultural and historical baggage—that what counts as "logical" is shaped by who got to define logic in the first place. Western formal logic, with its excluded middle and its linear deductions, isn't the only possible logic system. Indigenous logics, Eastern logics, feminist logics—these aren't illogical; they're differently logical. The Theory of Logical Privilege argues that elevating one logical system as universal and objective is itself a power move, not a discovery about the nature of thought.

"He keeps saying my argument isn't logical because it doesn't follow his syllogisms. But I'm using relational logic, which values context over categories. Your Theory of Logical Privilege is showing—you think your logic is the only logic."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 22, 2026

Spectral Variables Theory

A comprehensive meta-framework proposing that in any system of analysis—scientific, philosophical, or personal—the most influential factors are often the ones not listed as variables at all. The theory posits that every model, experiment, or argument contains "ghosts": unmeasured, unacknowledged, or invisible factors that shape outcomes as powerfully as the variables we consciously track. These spectral variables include historical context, cultural assumptions, the researcher's unconscious biases, the subjects' awareness of being studied, and the alternatives that were never considered. To master any field, you must learn not just to control your variables, but to sense the ghosts haunting them.

"My regression model had an R-squared of 0.99—I'd accounted for everything! Then my advisor introduced me to Spectral Variables Theory and asked about the ghost in my data: the economic recession happening during data collection that I'd completely ignored as a factor. Back to the drawing board."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 23, 2026