Scientific Perspectivism

The view that scientific knowledge is always from some perspective—there is no "view from nowhere" that captures reality as it truly is. Every observation, theory, and datum is situated within a particular framework: the wavelength your instrument can detect, the species-specific sensory apparatus of the human, the cultural questions that seemed worth asking, the theoretical commitments that shape what counts as a finding. Scientific Perspectivism doesn't deny that we learn real things about reality—it insists that we learn them from specific angles, and that combining angles gives a richer picture than any single one. Truth isn't abandoned; it's understood as necessarily partial.

"Your physics describes reality from the perspective of massive objects moving slowly relative to c. My indigenous astronomy describes reality from the perspective of creatures living in relationship with the sky. Scientific Perspectivism says we're both right, both partial, and both necessary for the full picture."

by Abzugal February 23, 2026

Scientific Contextualism

The recognition that scientific claims are true, meaningful, and valid only within specific contexts that must be specified. A finding from a lab in Sweden with undergraduate participants isn't automatically true for elderly farmers in Peru. A drug that works in controlled trials might fail in the context of poverty, malnutrition, and no clean water. Contextualism demands that science specify its conditions: under what circumstances, for whom, with what resources, in what cultural framework does this finding hold? It's the enemy of unwarranted generalization and the friend of actually useful knowledge.

"You can't just say 'studies show this diet works.' Scientific Contextualism demands: which studies? On whom? Under what conditions? With what funding? Because what worked for sedentary grad students in a metabolic ward might destroy my life as a construction worker with food insecurity."

by Abzugal February 23, 2026

Scientific Constructivism

The position that scientific facts are not simply discovered waiting in nature, but are actively constructed by scientific communities through their practices, instruments, theories, and social negotiations. This doesn't mean facts are arbitrary or "made up"—it means that nature doesn't come pre-packaged into facts; we have to build the packages. A quark is real, but "quark" as a category required accelerators, detectors, mathematics, and conferences to agree on what was seen. Constructivism studies how these packages get built, whose labor builds them, and what gets left out of the final product.

"Before the microscope, 'cells' didn't exist as facts—they were constructed when lens-grinders, biologists, and specimen-stainers created the conditions to see them. Scientific Constructivism just asks us to remember that facts have factories, and the factories matter."

by Abzugal February 23, 2026

Scientific Eclectism

A pragmatic approach that draws methods, theories, and concepts from multiple scientific traditions without pledging allegiance to any single one. The Eclectic scientist uses whatever tools work for the problem at hand: quantum mechanics for the small, classical mechanics for the medium, statistical mechanics for the large, and maybe some indigenous ecological knowledge if it fits. This approach infuriates purists but often solves problems that single-framework thinking cannot. The risk is incoherence—borrowing without integrating. The reward is flexibility—solving real-world problems without caring whether your toolkit is philosophically consistent.

"My research on ecosystem restoration uses Western ecology for the plants, local farmers' knowledge for the soil, and Bayesian statistics for the uncertainty. Scientific Eclectism means I don't care if they don't philosophically align—I care if the forest grows back."

by Abzugal February 23, 2026

Scientific Infinitism

The epistemological position that justification in science never comes to a final resting point—there are always further reasons, deeper causes, more fundamental theories. You explain a phenomenon with a law, but what justifies the law? A theory, but what justifies the theory? A paradigm, but what justifies the paradigm? Infinitism holds that this regress isn't vicious but productive: science advances not by reaching foundations but by pushing the infinite regress further back, finding ever deeper questions behind answers. The goal isn't a final stop—it's an infinite journey with progressively better views.

"You keep asking 'why' to every explanation I give. Scientific Infinitism says that's not annoying—that's the whole point. We don't need a final answer; we need an infinite chain of increasingly interesting questions. Keep asking why forever. That's science."

by Abzugal February 23, 2026

Scientific Spectralism

The application of Spectralist philosophy to science: the recognition that every scientific finding is haunted by what it excludes, ignores, or cannot measure. The measured temperature is haunted by the unmeasured humidity. The published positive results are haunted by the file drawer of negative findings. The studied population is haunted by everyone who didn't participate, couldn't be reached, or wasn't considered worth studying. Scientific Spectralism doesn't aim to exorcise these ghosts—it aims to make them visible, to ask what's haunting your data, and to incorporate that awareness into your conclusions. Good science is ghost-science.

"Your climate model is elegant, but Scientific Spectralism asks about its ghosts: the clouds we can't simulate well, the ocean currents we're still mapping, the feedback loops we haven't discovered yet. The model is haunted by what it can't see, and pretending otherwise is bad science."

by Abzugal February 23, 2026

Scientific Spectrumism

The view that scientific categories, species, and phenomena exist on continuous spectra rather than in discrete boxes, and that our classifications are convenient divisions of seamless reality. Species blend into subspecies blend into populations. Elements have isotopes that blur the boundaries. Health and disease exist on a continuum, not a binary. Scientific Spectrumism studies how and why we draw lines through continuous fields, and what we lose when we forget the lines are ours. It's the science of gradients, fuzzy boundaries, and the violence of the discrete.

"Biology keeps arguing about whether this virus is alive. Scientific Spectrumism says: viruses exist on a spectrum between chemistry and life, and your binary question is the problem. Nature doesn't do boxes—it does gradients. Get with the program."

by Abzugal February 23, 2026