The 6 Axes of the Pseudoscience Spectrum

A comprehensive model adding dimensions of motivation and explanatory power. Axis 1: Methodological Soundness. Axis 2: Progressive-Stagnant. Axis 3: Falsifiability-Unfalsifiability. Axis 4: Engagement-Ignorance. Axis 5: Motivated-Ingenuous (driven by ideological/economic agenda vs. genuine inquiry). Axis 6: Explanatory-Ad Hoc (generates new explanations vs. just invents excuses for failed predictions). These six axes generate sixty-four positions. Anti-vax claims are unsound, stagnant, unfalsifiable (vaccines cause everything, so nothing counts), ignorant, motivated (ideological/economic), ad hoc (new excuses for every failure). The 6 Axes reveal that pseudoscience isn't just bad science—it's science that's bad in multiple, reinforcing ways.

The 6 Axes of the Pseudoscience Spectrum "You want to know why climate denial is pseudoscience? The 6 Axes count the ways: unsound methods, stagnation (same arguments for decades), unfalsifiable (any weather proves their point), ignorant (ignore 99% of research), motivated (fossil fuel funding), ad hoc (every new data point gets explained away). Six axes, six failures. That's not skepticism—that's a syndrome."

by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026

The 8 Axes of the Pseudoscience Spectrum

A detailed model adding dimensions of community structure and relationship to authority. Axis 1: Methodological Soundness. Axis 2: Progressive-Stagnant. Axis 3: Falsifiability-Unfalsifiability. Axis 4: Engagement-Ignorance. Axis 5: Motivated-Ingenuous. Axis 6: Explanatory-Ad Hoc. Axis 7: Community-Solitary (has its own pseudo-academic institutions vs. lone geniuses with no community). Axis 8: Authority-Evidence (appeals to ancient wisdom/gurus vs. appeals to evidence). These eight axes create 256 positions. Homeopathy has its own journals (community), appeals to "like cures like" (authority), and fails on all previous axes. The 8 Axes demonstrate that pseudoscience is a multidimensional phenomenon that mimics science's social structures while violating its core norms.

The 8 Axes of the Pseudoscience Spectrum "Creation science has journals and conferences—so it must be science, right? The 8 Axes show why that fails: community structure (axis 7) is present, but it fails on method, progress, falsifiability, engagement, motivation, explanation, and appeals to authority. One axis doesn't save the other seven. Mimicking science isn't the same as doing it."

by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026

The 12 Axes of the Pseudoscience Spectrum

An ultra-fine-grained model adding dimensions of cognitive style and historical trajectory. Building on the 8 Axes, we add: Axis 9: Empirical-Anecdotal (relies on systematic data vs. stories and testimonials). Axis 10: Parsimonious-Lavish (simple explanations vs. multiplying entities needlessly). Axis 11: Consistent-Contradictory (internally coherent vs. self-contradictory). Axis 12: Cumulative-Erasive (builds on past knowledge vs. constantly starts over). These twelve axes generate 4096 positions. Holocaust denial fails on nearly all axes: anecdotal (cherry-picks), lavish (complex conspiracies), contradictory (can't keep story straight), erasive (ignores overwhelming evidence). The 12 Axes reveal that pseudoscience isn't a binary category but a region in multidimensional space—and some claims are more pseudoscientific than others.

The 12 Axes of the Pseudoscience Spectrum "You want a simple test for pseudoscience? The 12 Axes are the test. Each axis is a question: does it use evidence or anecdotes? Simple explanations or endless excuses? Consistent or contradictory? Cumulative or starting over? Twelve questions, twelve chances to fail. If you're failing most of them, you're not doing science—you're doing something else, and you should admit it."

by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026

The 16 Axes of the Pseudoscience Spectrum

The ultimate model, adding the final dimensions of relationship to truth and social function. Building on the 12 Axes, we add: Axis 13: Truth-Seeking-Identity-Protecting (aims at truth vs. aims at protecting group identity). Axis 14: Self-Correcting-Defensive (changes when wrong vs. doubles down). Axis 15: Transparent-Opaque (methods open to scrutiny vs. hidden or secret). Axis 16: Beneficial-Harmful (effects on human welfare). These sixteen axes generate 65,536 potential positions—enough to capture every fringe theory, every pseudoscience, every pathological science. The 16 Axes reveal that pseudoscience isn't a single thing but a family resemblance concept: claims that cluster on the wrong ends of multiple axes. Astrology fails on most axes. Homeopathy fails on most. Climate denial fails on most. But they fail in different patterns, for different reasons, with different consequences. The 16 Axes don't give you a simple pseudoscience detector—they give you a map of the territory, showing why some claims are closer to science and others are farther away, why some are harmless and others deadly, why some are just confused and others are actively deceptive.

The 16 Axes of the Pseudoscience Spectrum "You want a line between science and pseudoscience. The 16 Axes show there is no line—there's a multidimensional space with 65,536 positions. Astrology is far on method, progress, falsifiability, engagement, motivation, explanation, community, authority, evidence, parsimony, consistency, cumulation, identity (it's identity-protecting), defensiveness (doubles down), transparency (methods public but bad), and harm (mostly harmless). Climate denial is far on different axes, with different harms. The 16 Axes don't draw a line—they give you a language for why things are different, even when they're both not science. That's not relativism—that's precision."

by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026

The 2 Axes of the Parascience Spectrum

A foundational model for understanding parascience—fields of inquiry that exist alongside conventional science without necessarily opposing it—along two fundamental dimensions. The first axis runs from Empirically Testable (claims that could potentially be investigated through observation and experiment) to Empirically Untestable (claims that currently resist scientific investigation due to methodology limits or phenomenon nature). The second axis runs from Mainstream-Compatible (findings could potentially integrate with conventional science) to Mainstream-Incompatible (findings would require fundamental revision of scientific paradigms). These two axes create four parascience categories: testable-compatible (fringe physics, some parapsychology research), testable-incompatible (phenomena that would break known physics if confirmed), untestable-compatible (philosophical questions, some spiritual experiences), untestable-incompatible (realms claimed to be beyond any possible investigation). The model reveals that parascience isn't a single thing—it's a diverse landscape of claims with different relationships to scientific method and scientific orthodoxy.

The 2 Axes of the Parascience Spectrum "You lump all parascience together as 'woo.' The 2 Axes show otherwise: telepathy research is testable but incompatible (would break physics). Meditation experiences are untestable but compatible (they don't contradict science). Different axes, different statuses. Not all parascience is the same kind of not-science."

by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026

The 4 Axes of the Parascience Spectrum

An expanded model adding two crucial dimensions for finer discrimination. Axis 1: Testable-Untestable (can we investigate this?). Axis 2: Compatible-Incompatible (would it fit current science?). Axis 3: Experiential-Experimental (known through personal experience vs. potentially replicable in lab). Axis 4: Subjective-Objective (exists only for experiencer vs. potentially intersubjective). These four axes create sixteen parascience positions. Near-death experiences are untestable (can't replicate dying), incompatible (consciousness without brain? that's a revolution), experiential (known through personal reports), subjective (each experience unique). Telepathy research is testable, incompatible, experimental, potentially objective. The 4 Axes reveal that parascience debates often confuse these dimensions—dismissing subjective experiences as if they should meet experimental standards.

The 4 Axes of the Parascience Spectrum "You say NDEs aren't real because they can't be replicated in a lab. The 4 Axes show category error: NDEs are on the experiential, subjective end of the spectrum. Applying experimental, objective standards is like judging poetry by grammar rules. Wrong tool for the domain."

by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026

The 6 Axes of the Parascience Spectrum

A comprehensive model adding dimensions of explanation and tradition. Axis 1: Testable-Untestable. Axis 2: Compatible-Incompatible. Axis 3: Experiential-Experimental. Axis 4: Subjective-Objective. Axis 5: Explained-Mysterious (could be explained by known mechanisms vs. genuinely mysterious). Axis 6: Traditional-Novel (ancient wisdom vs. recent claims). These six axes generate sixty-four parascience positions. Homeopathy is testable, incompatible (with pharmacology), experimental, objective (would work for anyone if real), explained (dilution can't work), novel (historically, not ancient). Meditation experiences are untestable, compatible, experiential, subjective, explained (neuroscience explains some), traditional. The 6 Axes reveal that parascience is a multidimensional space where ancient traditions and modern claims occupy very different coordinates.

The 6 Axes of the Parascience Spectrum "You think all parascience is equally valid or invalid. The 6 Axes show otherwise: meditation has tradition, compatibility, explanation on its side—it's on the compatible end. Homeopathy has none of that—it's testable and fails, incompatible with known science, explained in the 'doesn't work' sense. Same parascience label, completely different positions."

by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026