Fractalism (Cognitive Sciences)

A model of the mind proposing that cognition itself is a fractal process. A single thought contains the pattern of a whole line of reasoning. A moment of perception is structured like a whole memory. The way you solve a small, trivial problem (like a typo) is a miniature, faster version of how you solve a major life crisis. The brain is not a computer with different programs, but a single, infinitely complex pattern-generator, creating self-similar structures of thought at every level of consciousness.

Fractalism (Cognitive Sciences) "The way you panicked over that typo in your email—the frantic search for a solution, the blame-shifting, the eventual acceptance—was the exact same pattern as how you handled your last breakup. Your brain doesn't have different 'crisis modules'; it just runs the same fractal pattern on different-sized inputs."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Macrocosm and Microcosm (Science)

The principle that the patterns and structures of the very large (macrocosm) are reflected in the very small (microcosm), and vice versa. It's the scientific echo of "as above, so below." An atom with a nucleus and orbiting electrons structurally resembles a solar system with a star and orbiting planets. The neural networks in your brain resemble the web of galaxies in the universe. This concept suggests that the universe is a self-similar, holographic system where the laws of physics create repeating patterns at every scale, from the quantum foam to the cosmic web. Understanding the microcosm (like quantum mechanics) often gives you the keys to understanding the macrocosm (like the behavior of black holes).

Macrocosm and Microcosm (Science) "Look at this fractal broccoli. Now look at a satellite image of a forest. Now look at a diagram of your lungs. Macrocosm and Microcosm, baby. Nature's just copy-pasting the same 'efficient branching' design at every scale because it's too lazy to come up with something new."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 22, 2026

Hard Problem of Science-Pseudoscience Demarcation

The notoriously difficult challenge of drawing a clean line between legitimate science and its fraudulent imitators. Where does physics end and metaphysics begin? When does speculative biology become pseudobiology? The problem is that science and pseudoscience exist on a spectrum, with no single magic criterion—falsifiability, peer review, empirical method—that perfectly separates them in all cases. Astrology is easy to dismiss, but what about string theory, which makes no testable predictions? What about Freudian psychology, which is culturally influential but methodologically dubious? The Hard Problem is that demarcation is itself a scientific and philosophical puzzle with no universally accepted solution.

Hard Problem of Science-Pseudoscience Demarcation "I know homeopathy is pseudoscience—it's water with memory or whatever. But is economics a science? It makes predictions, but they're always wrong. Is psychology? It studies minds, but can't agree on basic methods. The Hard Problem of Demarcation is why your 'just use common sense' approach doesn't actually work."

by Dumu The Void February 23, 2026

Methods of Study in the Social Sciences

The notoriously messy toolkit used to study human behavior, which refuses to sit still for clean measurement like chemicals or cells. These methods include surveys (asking people what they do, getting what they say they do), interviews (asking deeply, getting complicated stories), ethnography (living with people until they forget you're watching), statistical analysis (finding patterns in chaos), and case studies (going deep on one thing, sacrificing breadth). Unlike physics, social science methods must grapple with reflexive subjects who change when studied, cultural contexts that shift meaning, and the small problem that the researchers are also humans with biases. It's science, but science with feelings.

"I tried to apply the Methods of Study in the Social Sciences to my family Thanksgiving. Let's just say participant observation gets awkward when your participants know you're observing and demand to know what you're writing."

by Dumu The Void February 23, 2026

Relativistic Scientific Method (Method of Relativity of Science)

A framework acknowledging that scientific findings are always relative to the conditions under which they were produced—the instruments available, the cultural assumptions of the researchers, the historical moment, even the language used to describe them. This isn't the claim that "everything is relative" in the pop sense, but rather that science must account for its own situatedness. A result from 1950s America with male researchers and male subjects isn't universally valid without checking. Relativistic Method doesn't abandon objectivity—it pursues it by factoring in the observer's position, like Einstein did with physics, but applied to knowledge itself.

Relativistic Scientific Method (Method of Relativity of Science) "Your 'universal' finding about human cognition came from studying 200 undergrads at your university. Relativistic Scientific Method says we need to specify: this finding is relative to WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) populations, not humanity. Context matters."

by Dumu The Void February 23, 2026

Spectral Variables (Science)

In scientific practice, spectral variables are the factors that influence experimental results but exist outside the formal framework of the study design. They include the instrument drift you didn't calibrate for, the lab technician's caffeine level affecting their precision, the subtle differences between batches of reagents, or the fact that your control group talked to your experimental group in the parking lot. Good science acknowledges spectral variables through blind protocols, randomization, and replication. Great science admits that no matter how rigorous you are, some ghosts always slip through, and humility about what you've actually proven is the only appropriate response.

Spectral Variables (Science) "The paper claims perfect methodology, but I'm suspicious of the Spectral Variables. Who funded it? Were the grad students asleep during data collection? Is the lead author up for tenure? Science isn't just what's measured—it's haunted by what's not."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 23, 2026

Spectral Variables (Cognitive Sciences)

In the study of mind and brain, spectral variables are the unmeasured factors that shape cognitive performance, neural activity, and behavioral data. These include the participant's caffeine level, whether they ate breakfast, their mood from a text received right before the study, their unconscious expectations about what the researcher wants, and the entire lifetime of experience that precedes the 45 minutes they spend in your lab. Cognitive science that ignores spectral variables mistakes the brain in the scanner for the brain in the world. The ghosts are always there, whispering to your subjects while you measure their reaction times.

Spectral Variables (Cognitive Sciences) "We thought we were measuring working memory capacity. But the Spectral Variables were doing the work: participants who'd slept well performed better, participants who'd argued with their partner performed worse, and one guy was just really stressed about his cat. Our 'pure' measure was haunted by life."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 23, 2026