Law of Dynamics-Complexity of Sciences

The foundational principle that for any field of inquiry to qualify as scientific, it must study either dynamic systems (systems that change over time), complex systems (systems with interacting components that produce emergent behavior), or both. Static, simple systems may be mathematically describable, but they're not truly scientific—they're just puzzles. The law of dynamics-complexity explains why physics is science (dynamic, often complex), why biology is science (definitely both), and why some fields struggle for scientific status—they're studying phenomena that are either too static, too simple, or both. This law also explains why your love life feels like an unscientific mess: it's dynamic, complex, and completely resistant to prediction, which actually makes it more scientific than a simple, predictable system. Small comfort.

Law of Dynamics-Complexity of Sciences Example: "He tried to argue that astrology was scientific because it made predictions. She invoked the law of dynamics-complexity: 'Science studies dynamic, complex systems. Astrology treats human lives as simple, static outputs of planetary positions. That's not science; that's just wrong.' He said the planets were dynamic. She said not dynamic enough. The argument was dynamic and complex, which at least made it scientific."

by AbzuInExile February 16, 2026

Law of the Spectrum of Sciences

The principle that scientific status exists on a spectrum—fields aren't simply "science" or "not science" but occupy different positions on a continuum from "hard science" (physics, chemistry) through "soft science" (psychology, sociology) to "borderline science" (some forms of economics) to "not really science" (theology, astrology). This law acknowledges that the boundaries between science and non-science are fuzzy, that fields can move along the spectrum over time, and that the question isn't "is it science?" but "where on the scientific spectrum does it fall?" The law of the spectrum of sciences goes hand in hand with the theory of the same name, providing the meta-framework for understanding why some departments get more funding than others and why physicists look down on sociologists (they're just farther along the spectrum, or think they are).

Example: "He declared that psychology wasn't a real science. She invoked the law of the spectrum of sciences: 'It's not that psychology isn't science; it's that it's on a different part of the spectrum than physics. Different methods, different objects of study, different standards. The spectrum includes both. Your binary thinking is the problem.' He said physics was still better. She said that wasn't the question."

by AbzuInExile February 16, 2026

Theory of the Spectrum of Sciences

The comprehensive framework proposing that all fields of inquiry exist on a multidimensional spectrum defined by axes including: mathematical rigor, experimental control, predictive power, reproducibility, and objectivity. This theory explains why mathematics is at one end (maximal rigor, minimal empirical content) and literary criticism at the other (minimal rigor, maximal interpretation), with everything else distributed in between. The theory of the spectrum of sciences acknowledges that "science" isn't a binary category but a region of spectral space, with fuzzy boundaries, contested territories, and ongoing border disputes. It's the theory that makes peace between warring departments by saying, "You're all on the spectrum—just different parts of it."

Example: "She used the theory of the spectrum of sciences to calm a faculty meeting where physics and sociology were fighting over funding. 'You're both on the spectrum,' she said. 'Physics is high on the mathematical-rigor axis; sociology is high on the real-world-relevance axis. Different coordinates, same spectral space. Can we share?' They couldn't, but at least they understood why they were fighting."

by AbzuInExile February 16, 2026

4D Sciences

The systematic study of phenomena across the four dimensions of spacetime—length, width, height, and time. Unlike 3D sciences, which treat time as a separate parameter, 4D sciences integrate time as a full dimension, meaning objects are understood as four-dimensional "worldlines" extending from birth to death. A person isn't a 3D object that changes over time; they're a 4D object—a spacetime worm—with their infant self connected to their adult self connected to their future corpse. 4D sciences explain why you can never step in the same river twice (the river's 4D shape is different), why your past self feels like a stranger (they're just far away in the time dimension), and why you should be nice to your future self (they're literally the same 4D object).

*Example: "She applied 4D sciences to her relationship, viewing it as a single four-dimensional object rather than a series of 3D moments. The fights weren't separate events; they were just points on the relationship's worldline. The good times were other points. The whole thing was one continuous shape. It didn't make the fights hurt less, but it helped her see them as part of something larger."*

by AbzuInExile February 16, 2026

5D Sciences

The study of phenomena across five dimensions: spacetime plus probability. In 5D sciences, every event exists not just at a specific spacetime coordinate but across a spectrum of probability branches. The 5D sciences investigate how objects and events are distributed across these branches, how they interact between branches, and why you always seem to end up in the branch where you forgot your keys. 5D sciences explain déjà vu (brief overlap with a probability branch where you've already experienced this), intuition (access to information from branches where you already know), and regret (awareness of branches where you made better choices). It's the science of "what if" made rigorous.

Example: "He used 5D sciences to analyze his career path. In one probability branch, he took the job and thrived. In another, he declined and found something better. In a third, he was hit by a bus and never worked again. His actual branch was the one where he took the job and was moderately content. 5D sciences explained why he kept wondering about the other branches—they were real, just inaccessible."

by AbzuInExile February 16, 2026

6D Sciences

The study of phenomena across six dimensions: spacetime, probability, and initial conditions. In 6D sciences, the focus expands to include not just different choices (5D) but different starting points—different genetics, different parents, different birthplaces, different historical contexts. 6D sciences investigate how initial conditions branch into entire families of probability trees, creating infinite variations on life's starting points. This explains why some people seem born lucky (favorable initial conditions in this branch) and why comparing yourself to others is so complicated (they're running on different initial conditions entirely). 6D sciences are the ultimate antidote to blame and judgment—they reveal that your starting point was just one of infinite possibilities, none chosen, all real somewhere.

Example: "She applied 6D sciences to her resentment of her more successful sibling. In this branch, they had the same parents, same upbringing—similar initial conditions. But in 6D, initial conditions branch infinitely. Somewhere, she was the successful one and her sibling was struggling. The resentment didn't disappear, but it softened, knowing that the initial conditions weren't fixed—just fixed in this branch."

by AbzuInExile February 16, 2026

7D Sciences

The study of phenomena across seven dimensions: spacetime, probability, initial conditions, and physical laws. In 7D sciences, the framework expands to include universes with different physics—different constants, different forces, different fundamental rules. 7D sciences investigate how reality itself varies across dimensional slices, how life might evolve under alternative physics, and what kinds of consciousness could exist in universes where gravity is stronger, light is slower, or time flows backward. This is the science of the multiverse proper—not just different histories but different kinds of reality entirely. 7D sciences explain why we can't find aliens: they're in dimensions with different physics, playing by different rules, possibly wondering why we're so obsessed with carbon-based life.

Example: "He invoked 7D sciences to explain his persistent bad luck. 'In this universe, with these physical laws, I'm unlucky. But somewhere in 7D space, in a universe with different physics—maybe where probability works differently—I'm the luckiest person alive. I'm just in the wrong dimensional slice.' His friends said that was just a fancy way of saying life wasn't fair. He said that was exactly the point."

by AbzuInExile February 16, 2026