Zoomer: Yo, check this funny meme *Shows a random equals funny meme*
Every other generation: I don’t get it.
Every other generation: I don’t get it.
by I’mNotReallyGoodAtUsernames:( October 11, 2023
Get the Random equals funny mug.A random purple bunny red overalls yellow eyes and teeth, that is very much annoying like fuck, he never shuts up, and he likes to make all the chaos, also his rizz technique is very good being annoying to girls, bro even ppl in rl think he’s the best.
Random purple bunny: oh and watch out for centipedes :D
Rand0m doll: (random purple bunny)!!!! You know that’s my only fear, right!!1!
Rand0m doll: (random purple bunny)!!!! You know that’s my only fear, right!!1!
by Alpsiumnomyo (aka joe mama) October 23, 2023
Get the Random purple bunny mug.Any forum topic that has a considerable level of toxicity and will get locked in a day or two. Usually very difficult to moderate, but still doesn't beat the numberblocks community in toxicity level.
by hotcrystal0 October 29, 2023
Get the Random Posts mug.by MISTER MlSTER November 1, 2023
Get the Randomness mug.Something that a random forgettable Tf2 YouTuber coined where weapons in TF2 have no random crits and that’s all it is and it has no use at all.
by 1955 Cadillac Coupe Deville December 18, 2022
Get the No Random Crits Syndrome mug.yay
Boyfriend is a young, light-skinned man with spiky cyan hair and a confident expression. He wears a magenta-white T-shirt with a red prohibition sign, baggy dark blue pants, pink-red sneakers with magenta-white shoelaces and soles as well as black dots on the quarters, and a backward pink-red cap with a dark blue brim. He holds a bluish gray microphone in his right hand while keeping his left hand in his pocket. He is drawn in a chibi style, giving the impression that he is very small and/or disproportionate.
During Week 4, his hair gets blown around as a result of standing on a moving car.
During Week 5, he wears a red parka with white fur, light blue pants and light brown snow boots, to suit the Christmas theme.
During Week 6 and as the opponent of the unused song Test, his regular appearance is brightened and rendered in pixel art style. He also moves his mic differently.
During the last track of Week 7, he holds Girlfriend up by the waist with his left hand.
Boyfriend is a young, light-skinned man with spiky cyan hair and a confident expression. He wears a magenta-white T-shirt with a red prohibition sign, baggy dark blue pants, pink-red sneakers with magenta-white shoelaces and soles as well as black dots on the quarters, and a backward pink-red cap with a dark blue brim. He holds a bluish gray microphone in his right hand while keeping his left hand in his pocket. He is drawn in a chibi style, giving the impression that he is very small and/or disproportionate.
During Week 4, his hair gets blown around as a result of standing on a moving car.
During Week 5, he wears a red parka with white fur, light blue pants and light brown snow boots, to suit the Christmas theme.
During Week 6 and as the opponent of the unused song Test, his regular appearance is brightened and rendered in pixel art style. He also moves his mic differently.
During the last track of Week 7, he holds Girlfriend up by the waist with his left hand.
woah did you know Boyfriend is a young, light-skinned man with spiky cyan hair and a confident expression. He wears a magenta-white T-shirt with a red prohibition sign, baggy dark blue pants, pink-red sneakers with magenta-white shoelaces and soles as well as black dots on the quarters, and a backward pink-red cap with a dark blue brim. He holds a bluish gray microphone in his right hand while keeping his left hand in his pocket. He is drawn in a chibi style, giving the impression that he is very small and/or disproportionate.
During Week 4, his hair gets blown around as a result of standing on a moving car.
During Week 5, he wears a red parka with white fur, light blue pants and light brown snow boots, to suit the Christmas theme.
During Week 6 and as the opponent of the unused song Test, his regular appearance is brightened and rendered in pixel art style. He also moves his mic differently.
you found this probably through random search or google suggestions
During the last track of Week 7, he holds Girlfriend up by the waist with his left hand.
During Week 4, his hair gets blown around as a result of standing on a moving car.
During Week 5, he wears a red parka with white fur, light blue pants and light brown snow boots, to suit the Christmas theme.
During Week 6 and as the opponent of the unused song Test, his regular appearance is brightened and rendered in pixel art style. He also moves his mic differently.
you found this probably through random search or google suggestions
During the last track of Week 7, he holds Girlfriend up by the waist with his left hand.
by SauceQuest31 December 29, 2022
Get the you found this probably through random search or google suggestions mug.I'm glad that you brought that up because it takes me to my second problem with determinism. Let's try and visualize your argument.
D
>ID - ID
R > R
ED
So, and action is either Random (R) or Determined. If it's Determined it's either Internally (ID) or Externally (ED) Determined. If it's Externally Determined, then you have no control. If it's Internally Determined, then the internal determination is either Determined or Random. And I'm guessing that by "Determined" you mean "The necessary byproduct of an antecedent chain in which the actor or mechanism could not have done otherwise," Correct? Is that close? Does that make sense? I feel like there are a lot of presuppositions that need to be unpacked.
Hym "So, how is asking whether or not something is determined or random any different than asking whether or not my bedroom is hot or cold? It's both. And neither. It's, like, luke warm. So, you presuppose the absence of a grey area between determined and random. That random and determine don't exist on a spectrum in the same way hot and cold exist on a spectrum. As though thinks can't be more or less determined or more or less random. Is the outcome of a coin to more or less random than the outcome of rolling a 20 sided dice? You could say that the outcome is determined I guess. By the exact about of force used to roll the dice or flip the coin.
D
>ID - ID
R > R
ED
So, and action is either Random (R) or Determined. If it's Determined it's either Internally (ID) or Externally (ED) Determined. If it's Externally Determined, then you have no control. If it's Internally Determined, then the internal determination is either Determined or Random. And I'm guessing that by "Determined" you mean "The necessary byproduct of an antecedent chain in which the actor or mechanism could not have done otherwise," Correct? Is that close? Does that make sense? I feel like there are a lot of presuppositions that need to be unpacked.
Hym "So, how is asking whether or not something is determined or random any different than asking whether or not my bedroom is hot or cold? It's both. And neither. It's, like, luke warm. So, you presuppose the absence of a grey area between determined and random. That random and determine don't exist on a spectrum in the same way hot and cold exist on a spectrum. As though thinks can't be more or less determined or more or less random. Is the outcome of a coin to more or less random than the outcome of rolling a 20 sided dice? You could say that the outcome is determined I guess. By the exact about of force used to roll the dice or flip the coin.
The relationship between the material of the dice and the material of the surface of the table or the conditions of the air in the room you're flipping the coin. Also, if we accept 'determined' as 'the necessary byproduct of an antecedent chain in which the actor or mechanism could not have done otherwise' you presuppose that what happens in response to a given antecedent chain is what OUGHT to happen in response to said chain. So, Antecedent Chain A -> either Outcome A or Outcome B. If ACA -> OA then you have to presuppose that what ought to happen in response to ACA is OA. If ACA -> OB then, again, you're forced to presuppose that what ought a happen in response to ACA is OB. But if the likelihood of ACA leading to OB is 1% and it HAPPENS ANYWAY... What you have is NOT an outcome that 'couldn't have been otherwise' but, rather, SHOULD have been otherwise and wasn't. Ya feel me? So, I know this doesn't demonstrate free will but I don't think you have been able to successfully demonstrate that there isn't a point at which 'the self' is not the fundamental locus of control in any given choice. It's a good argument though. It's tricky. But it's like a weird semantic blackhole. It's like saying 'Well, if you don't actively control the firing of your neurons, you don't actually control yourself.' Just weird. Determined or random."
by Hym Iam December 5, 2023
Get the Determined or Random mug.