Systematic patterns of deviation from norm or rationality in the application of logical rules, often driven by emotion, worldview, or cognitive shortcuts. This isn't about formal fallacies, but about the biased choices we make within logic: which premises we accept, which inferences we draw, and which counter-arguments we entertain. It's the subjectivity hidden inside the objective shell of logic.
Logical Biases Example: Two people see the same data on tax cuts. One, with a pro-market logical bias, immediately infers it will stimulate investment. The other, with an equity-focused logical bias, infers it will increase inequality. The same logical tool (inference from data) is wielded to different ends based on prior ideological commitments.
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026
Get the Logical Biases mug.Biases in how we select, apply, and trust different systems of logic themselves. This is a bias about your philosophical toolbox. For instance, a preference for crisp, binary logic (true/false) in situations requiring fuzzy or probabilistic reasoning, or the bias of dismissing an entire line of argument because it uses a logical framework (e.g., dialectics, abduction) you're not comfortable with.
Logical Metabiases Example: An engineer, steeped in deterministic, Boolean logic, dismisses a sociologist's dialectical analysis of social change as "illogical." This is a Logical Metabias. The engineer is biased against a whole form of reasoning appropriate for complex, contradictory systems, falsely believing their own logical paradigm is universally supreme.
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026
Get the Logical Metabiases mug.an average guy with uncommon logic. When a guy is making a decision that has no rational justification and causes you frustration because he doesn't see that 99.9% of people see.
Chris logic is to purchase 3 donuts instead of splitting a dozen with 3 friends who each want 3 and saving money.
Chris logic is to rent out a single bedroom for $2500 to a traveling nurse when a whole apartment near him rents for that price.
Chris logic is to rent out a single bedroom for $2500 to a traveling nurse when a whole apartment near him rents for that price.
by PuzzlesAndChill February 5, 2026
Get the Chris logic mug.Similar to Logthinking, but focused on the social enforcement of logical formalism as the only permitted mode of discourse within a group. The group develops a shared dialect of syllogisms and fallacies, using it as a cudgel to win arguments rather than a tool to find truth. Appeals to experience, values, or practicality are ruled "illogical" and out of bounds, creating a sterile, hyper-rationalized echo chamber that is often logically sound but humanly obtuse.
Example: In a philosophy debate club, a member argues for compassion in ethics from a phenomenological perspective. They are swiftly shut down by the club's president: "Your argument commits the appeal to emotion fallacy. Until you can present a formal deontological or utilitarian syllogism, you have no valid point." This Logical Groupthinking privileges form over substance, ensuring only one style of thinking can be heard.
by Dumuabzu February 5, 2026
Get the Logical Groupthinking mug.1. The Academic Definition:
Social logicism is the interdisciplinary study of how formal logic and social structures interact. It examines two main things: first, how logical frameworks (like game theory, set theory, or rational choice models) can be applied to analyze social phenomena—think mapping the "logic" of institutional rules, online echo chambers, or collective decision-making. Second, and more critically, it investigates how the rhetoric of universal logic and rationality is socially used in practice. This means studying how appeals to "cold, hard logic" are often culturally loaded and deployed to legitimize certain viewpoints while discrediting others, frequently along lines of power, race, gender, or class. It asks: Whose reasoning gets labeled "irrational"? When is a logical framework a useful tool, and when is it a cultural weapon?
Social logicism is the interdisciplinary study of how formal logic and social structures interact. It examines two main things: first, how logical frameworks (like game theory, set theory, or rational choice models) can be applied to analyze social phenomena—think mapping the "logic" of institutional rules, online echo chambers, or collective decision-making. Second, and more critically, it investigates how the rhetoric of universal logic and rationality is socially used in practice. This means studying how appeals to "cold, hard logic" are often culturally loaded and deployed to legitimize certain viewpoints while discrediting others, frequently along lines of power, race, gender, or class. It asks: Whose reasoning gets labeled "irrational"? When is a logical framework a useful tool, and when is it a cultural weapon?
· Example (Application): A researcher uses network theory and logical rules of contagion to model how misinformation spreads virally in a social media ecosystem, identifying key logical nodes (like influencers) where interventions might be most effective.
· Example (Critical Analysis): In a corporate meeting, a proposal from the predominantly female marketing team is dismissed as "emotionally driven" and "illogical" by a male-dominated executive team insisting on "just the data." Social logicism would analyze this as a social use of "logic" to devalue contributions from a specific group, upholding a gendered hierarchy where their form of reasoning is defined as the universal standard.
· Example (Critical Analysis): In a corporate meeting, a proposal from the predominantly female marketing team is dismissed as "emotionally driven" and "illogical" by a male-dominated executive team insisting on "just the data." Social logicism would analyze this as a social use of "logic" to devalue contributions from a specific group, upholding a gendered hierarchy where their form of reasoning is defined as the universal standard.
by Dumuabzu February 6, 2026
Get the Social Logicism mug.2. The Weaponized Definition (More Common on the Street):
This is the cringey, often online, behavior of treating formal logic as a social super-weapon and the ultimate measure of human worth. It's the belief that all social, political, and moral problems are merely logic puzzles; that if you just construct a perfect syllogism, you can "solve" racism, "disprove" transgender identities, or "defeat" any opponent in debate. It reduces human experience, emotion, culture, and systemic injustice to flawed premises waiting to be corrected by a "rational" mind (almost always the speaker's). This view trivializes lived reality and is a classic tool for sealioning, tone-policing ("you're too emotional to be logical"), and maintaining privilege by setting up a game where only one side's tools are allowed.
This is the cringey, often online, behavior of treating formal logic as a social super-weapon and the ultimate measure of human worth. It's the belief that all social, political, and moral problems are merely logic puzzles; that if you just construct a perfect syllogism, you can "solve" racism, "disprove" transgender identities, or "defeat" any opponent in debate. It reduces human experience, emotion, culture, and systemic injustice to flawed premises waiting to be corrected by a "rational" mind (almost always the speaker's). This view trivializes lived reality and is a classic tool for sealioning, tone-policing ("you're too emotional to be logical"), and maintaining privilege by setting up a game where only one side's tools are allowed.
Social Logicism Example: A person argues online that systemic racism doesn't exist because "logically, if the law is race-blind, then outcomes are based on merit." They dismiss centuries of historical context, implicit bias, and sociological data as "illogical feelings," believing their clean, abstract deduction overrides the messy reality of millions of people. They're not interested in understanding; they're interested in "winning" with what they've labeled as logic.
· Example: In a discussion about healthcare, someone says, "I won't listen to your argument about suffering unless you present it with statistically significant peer-reviewed studies and a formal cost-benefit analysis. Your anecdotes are logically worthless." This weaponizes a narrow form of "logic" to shut down ethical and humanistic discourse, asserting control over what counts as a valid argument.
· Example: In a discussion about healthcare, someone says, "I won't listen to your argument about suffering unless you present it with statistically significant peer-reviewed studies and a formal cost-benefit analysis. Your anecdotes are logically worthless." This weaponizes a narrow form of "logic" to shut down ethical and humanistic discourse, asserting control over what counts as a valid argument.
by Dumuabzu February 6, 2026
Get the Social Logicism mug.This theory dissects how the language and prestige of formal logic are used as a social weapon to enforce conformity and dismiss dissent. It argues that appeals to "logic" and "rationality" are often culturally loaded and deployed to pathologize alternative viewpoints—especially emotional, intuitive, or culturally specific ones—as "illogical" or "irrational," thereby excluding them from serious discourse and legitimizing the status quo.
Theory of Logical Social Control Example: In a corporate meeting, a woman's proposal is dismissed by a male colleague who says, "Let's stick to the logical facts, not feelings," after she raised concerns about team morale. This is logical social control. He weaponizes a narrow, hyper-formal definition of "logic" to delegitimize her valid, experience-based argument, framing his position as objectively superior and reinforcing a gendered hierarchy of discourse.
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 7, 2026
Get the Theory of Logical Social Control mug.